The #1 Excuse Given for Speeding

Speeding and Car Accidents in Washington: What Drivers Should Know

Speeding reduces a driver’s ability to react, increases stopping distances, and makes collisions more severe. Under Washington law (RCW 46.61.400), drivers must obey posted speed limits and adjust their speed to match road conditions. A driver who causes an accident while speeding may be liable for the injured person’s medical bills, lost wages, and other damages.

Speeding remains one of the most common and most dangerous driving behaviors on Washington roads. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, speed is a contributing factor in roughly 29% of all traffic fatalities nationwide. In Washington specifically, hundreds of fatal and serious-injury crashes each year involve at least one driver exceeding the posted limit or traveling too fast for conditions.

Most drivers who speed know they are doing it. Surveys consistently find that the most common excuse is simply not seeing the speed limit sign—a claim about 20% of stopped drivers offer when asked. Other frequent explanations include following the pace of surrounding traffic, being unfamiliar with the road, rushing to handle an emergency, or relying on GPS navigation that seemed to suggest a higher speed was appropriate. While some of these reasons are understandable, none of them change the legal analysis when speeding causes a crash and someone gets hurt.

Why Speeding Makes Accidents More Likely and More Severe

Higher speeds compress reaction time, extend braking distance, and multiply the force of impact. A crash at 60 mph produces roughly four times the force of a crash at 30 mph.

Speed affects every phase of an accident. At higher velocities, a driver has less time to perceive a hazard, less time to decide how to respond, and more distance required to bring the vehicle to a stop. A car traveling at 60 mph covers 88 feet per second. At that speed, even a one-second delay in reaction translates to nearly 90 additional feet of travel before the brakes engage.

The physics of impact are equally unforgiving. Kinetic energy increases with the square of velocity, which means that small increases in speed produce disproportionately larger forces in a collision. A vehicle striking a fixed object at 40 mph generates roughly 56% more impact energy than one traveling at 30 mph. At freeway speeds, the forces involved regularly exceed the protective limits of modern vehicle safety systems, seatbelts, and airbags.

The injuries that result from speed-related crashes tend to reflect this. Speeding collisions are more likely to produce traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord damage, multiple fractures, and internal organ injuries—conditions that require extensive medical treatment and often result in long-term or permanent disability.

How Washington Law Treats Speeding Drivers Who Cause Accidents

A speeding driver who causes a crash has violated RCW 46.61.400, and that violation is strong evidence of negligence in a personal injury claim. Washington’s pure comparative negligence system (RCW 4.22.005) allows injured parties to recover compensation even if they were partially at fault.

Washington’s speed limit statute, RCW 46.61.400, requires drivers to obey posted limits and to reduce speed when conditions—weather, visibility, traffic, road surface—make it unsafe to drive at the posted maximum. Exceeding the speed limit is not just a traffic infraction; in the context of an accident, it serves as direct evidence that the driver failed to exercise reasonable care.

Under Washington’s negligence framework, a person injured in a car accident must establish four elements to recover compensation: that the other driver owed a duty of care, that the driver breached that duty, that the breach caused the accident, and that the accident resulted in actual damages. When the at-fault driver was speeding at the time of the collision, the duty and breach elements are typically straightforward—the posted speed limit establishes the standard of care, and exceeding it establishes the breach.

Washington also applies a pure comparative negligence rule under RCW 4.22.005. This means that even if the injured person bears some share of fault—for example, they were slightly over the speed limit themselves or failed to signal a lane change—they can still recover compensation. The award is simply reduced by the injured person’s percentage of fault. A driver found to be 20% at fault for a crash that caused $100,000 in damages would still recover $80,000.

In cases involving extreme speeds, Washington law goes further. Under RCW 46.61.465, exceeding the speed limit by a significant margin constitutes prima facie evidence of reckless driving—a gross misdemeanor carrying up to 364 days in jail and a $5,000 fine. When a speeding driver’s conduct rises to the level of recklessness, additional civil remedies may be available to the injured party.

Common Excuses for Speeding—and Why They Don’t Eliminate Liability

When drivers are stopped for speeding or questioned after an accident, the explanations they offer tend to follow a predictable pattern. The most frequently cited reasons include:

  1. Not seeing the speed limit sign. This is the single most common excuse, offered by roughly one in five drivers. However, drivers have a legal obligation to observe and follow posted signs.
  2. Being unfamiliar with the road. Not knowing the area does not reduce the duty to drive at a safe speed. If anything, unfamiliarity with the road is a reason to drive more cautiously.
  3. Not realizing they were over the limit. Lack of awareness does not excuse a speed violation. Drivers are responsible for monitoring their speedometer.
  4. Keeping pace with traffic. Following the flow of traffic is not a legal defense to speeding. The posted limit applies regardless of what other drivers are doing.
  5. Responding to a personal emergency. While a medical emergency may generate sympathy, it does not create a legal right to exceed the speed limit or eliminate civil liability if an accident occurs.

Other common explanations—missing a turn, needing a restroom, relying on GPS directions, or simply believing the speed was safe—follow the same legal logic. None of these reasons negate a driver’s obligation to follow posted limits and exercise reasonable care. In a personal injury claim, the question is not whether the driver had an understandable reason for speeding; it is whether their speed contributed to the accident and the resulting injuries.

What Compensation Is Available After a Speed-Related Accident?

Victims of speed-related car accidents in Washington may recover compensation for medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and other damages through an insurance claim or personal injury lawsuit.

The damages available in a speeding-related accident case depend on the severity of the injuries and the impact on the victim’s life. Washington personal injury law allows recovery for both economic and non-economic losses, including:

  • Current and future medical expenses, including emergency treatment, surgery, hospitalization, rehabilitation, and ongoing care
  • Lost wages and diminished earning capacity if the injury prevents the victim from returning to their previous employment
  • Pain and suffering, which account for the physical discomfort and emotional distress caused by the accident and the recovery process
  • Property damage, covering the cost of vehicle repair or replacement and any personal belongings destroyed in the crash

Washington does not impose a statutory cap on personal injury damages in most cases, meaning there is no predetermined limit on the compensation a jury can award. The statute of limitations for filing a personal injury lawsuit in Washington is three years from the date of the accident (RCW 4.16.080), though taking action sooner generally results in stronger evidence and more favorable outcomes.

Injured in an Accident Caused by a Speeding Driver?

A car accident caused by someone else’s decision to speed can leave you dealing with injuries, medical bills, and time away from work that you did not ask for and should not have to absorb on your own. Washington law provides a path to hold the at-fault driver accountable, but building a strong claim requires prompt action—preserving evidence, documenting injuries, and dealing with insurance companies that will look for every opportunity to minimize what they pay.

At Ritchie-Reiersen Injury & Immigration Attorneys, our Washington personal injury lawyers help accident victims throughout the state pursue the compensation they need to recover and move forward. With offices across Washington and a team that has recovered millions for our clients, we handle everything from insurance negotiations to trial preparation so you can focus on healing.

Call (888) 884-7337 to schedule a free consultation. We’ll review what happened, explain your legal options, and help you understand what your claim may be worth.