Was Your Immigration Case Handled by Alexandra Lozano? Get an Independent Second Opinion.

She was a Washington-licensed immigration attorney who operated under the names Alexandra Lozano Immigration Law, La Luz del Camino Legal, and Luz Legal. Following lawsuits over how humanitarian immigration cases were handled, she resigned her law license on May 26, 2026, was later suspended from practicing before federal immigration authorities, and her firm has since closed.

A federal mass action and a separate proposed class action allege that baseless or fraudulent VAWA and T-visa petitions were filed, and that client signatures appeared on documents without clients' knowledge or consent. Lozano denies wrongdoing, and none of this has been proven in court.

No, in either respect. We have no relationship with Alexandra Lozano, her former firm, or the attorneys handling the pending litigation. We are a separate, independent firm offering case reviews to anyone affected.

No. Getting a case review or hiring us has nothing to do with whether you join any lawsuit. The two are entirely separate tracks — one is about your immigration status, the other is about seeking financial compensation.

See the News Coverage and Official Resources sections below for verified reporting and government/nonprofit guidance.

Request it from the former firm directly, and separately request the version filed with USCIS through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. Having both lets a new attorney confirm they match.

You can file a complaint with the Washington State Attorney General's Office. We can also help you request records directly.

Not without legal advice first. If USCIS later finds fraud or a material misrepresentation, it can issue a Notice to Appear in immigration court even after a withdrawal, and in some cases this can lead to mandatory detention. Speak with an attorney before withdrawing anything.

You can update it online through your USCIS account, or by mailing Form AR-11. VAWA, T-visa, and U-visa cases are routed to specific service centers depending on your receipt number — we'll confirm the correct address for your case during your review.

The clearest way is to compare what was actually submitted to USCIS against what you remember agreeing to. An attorney reviewing both documents can usually spot inconsistencies, including signatures or statements you didn't authorize.

These are the categories most directly implicated in the pending lawsuits, so we prioritize reviewing them carefully — including whether the underlying facts presented to USCIS were accurate and whether you understood and agreed to what was filed.

Getting a confidential case review does not put your status at risk. What can create risk is taking action — like withdrawing a petition — without first understanding the consequences, which is exactly what a review is meant to prevent.

No. We'll tell you honestly whether we can help, what we'd do differently, and what it would cost — in writing — before you decide anything.

Yes. Our team includes bilingual staff so you can discuss your case in the language you're most comfortable with, from the first call through every update after.

We represent immigration clients throughout Washington State — including Seattle, Tacoma, Kent, Everett, Spokane, and the Tri-Cities — as well as clients in Oregon and Idaho.

Anything you have: your file from the former firm, USCIS notices or receipt numbers, and a rough timeline of what you were told and when. If you don't have any of this yet, that's fine — we can help you request it.